Skip to main content

What's so interesting?

When I photograph, I always ask myself, "what's so interesting about that?"


I thought this was interesting with the gentleman's head. I was going to just shoot the statue but I think this is better.

In this blog, I more or less investigate my fascination about photography.  The camera is just a machine that does not have a mind, and millions of cameras are out there but when this is controlled by a human it takes on a different life as an artistic equipment, if one choose to.




When the photographer asks, "what's so interesting?" This question is really about what the photographer values. It doesn't have to be all that deep but it touches on what makes each one of us different. As artists, all we do is explore that difference.



Here, I surprised myself by using a very shallow depth of field and rendering the background into something abstract. I think a good picture happens when whatever the photographer thought was interesting is clearly communicated to the viewer. And this clarity is mixture of framing, lens selection and all that stuff we teach ourselves in photography. What's so interesting about a blade of grass? I thought this blade isolated in this manner with more jagged background gave an interesting balance between the two. If the background was in focus, then it would've taken attention away from the delicate blade.



What's so interesting about this? Oh you know...



The light bulbs interested me here. And the cool blue and warm pink was extra.

What I like is different than what you may like, so when we photograph, we'll come up with something different. This difference loosely defines style, I think.

I believe, that whatever you may think is interesting, you need to clarify that vision, and use all your resources to get that idea across. That would be a good photograph. You may not like it because of what ever reasons but a clearly stated photo with easy to understand vision is a good photograph.

I used to see other photographers' work and wonder why I couldn't do what they do? We have the same camera, so why not?  The answer is because we are all different. Styles are established when we are comfortable with ourselves enough to say to others "Hey, this is what I thought it was interesting, so there!"




Comments

  1. Thanks for this insight. I always thought that others were better photographers than me, but after reading this I realise that it's the individual's style and vision that makes their photographs stand out. Now I will go and take what I want to get across instead of tryignt o emulate others work.

    ReplyDelete
  2. That's great Belinda! We all have our own vision, and that's what we have to hone. Having said that, we can learn by copying others' work too. Mostly technical skills, but a lesson is a lesson.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Boston: B&W Architecture with Leica Q2M: From a Purist Perspective.

I swear I was going to switch out my black and white ONLY Leica Q2M to a regular Q2 color camera before going to this trip.  I"m glad I didn't.   Oh, before I forget, take a look at my icandy slide shows .  I will be making slideshows that is designed for big screen TV's.  Take a look at this one: Ok, back to the topic on hand.  So one of the most asked question about the Leica Q2M is, 'why limit yourself to just black and white when you can easily convert color photos to BW?'  Very good question.  My answer is,  if you know with certainty you want the best quality BW image possible, you want the dedicated monochrome camera.  Am I being a staunch purist? or is there a practical argument for it? Let's talk about it.  Beacon Street Boston,  MA One of many beautiful architecture on that hill.   First, this camera doesn't have any moire filter on the sensor.  Moire filters are on most color camera sensors to get rid of those annoying repeating patterns that loo

Backpacking the Sierras (with my tiny but mighty camera)

Over the summer I had the chance to hike the James Muir Trail (JMT) that runs along the Sierra Nevada Mountains in California.  This trail starts at the Yosemite Valley and ends at Mount Whitney summit, which is the highest point in the lower 48 states at 14,505 feet.  The trail is 211 miles long with total elevation gain of 47,000 feet.   Click here to see the entire gallery Me by Garnet Lake  This was not a "photo" expedition for me (even though I did take a small camera and took around 4K photos!) I had many reasons why I didn't want to make it a photography trip.  Do you want to know why? Ok. My hiking crew.  Mt. Ritter in the back there yonder. Reason number 1).  This was my first real through hike.  For you newcomers a "through hike" means to hike in one session or outing, the entire length of a particular trail.  I've done multi-day section hikes on the  Appalachian Trail (AT) before, but for this hike we scheduled 23 days.  So, this was not just a

Let There be (additional wirelessly controlled portable electronic) Light! With Canon 600RT

Canon 5D MK3, 50 1.2L, with 600EX-RT triggered by ST-E3-RT Click to see Portfolio  I've always held fast to the notion that there is nothing more beautiful of a light source than the natural light and I still do. I sometimes like to at least try to prove myself wrong. The reason being is that I believe that your ideas can, and should change… At least welcome the notion of that change. As it is true with many of my photographic ideas, some of the ideas have roots that goes way back.  I was flirting with the idea of shooting nature with electronic flash. Yes, that's sacrilegious to many including myself, till I realized that while believing in something strongly is good, holding onto something too strongly can lead to stagnation. And as we know, stagnation leads to death! Yes, Death! (repetition for dramatic effect). Canon 5D MK3, 50 1.2L, with 600EX-RT triggered by ST-E3-RT Click to see Portfolio  So today I headed out to the woods to test out this idea. Armed wit