I wanted to expand on scanning the 4x5 instant film negative bit further. I'm really excited about this because it offers such a distinct texture and color that it stands out in our world of sparkly clean digital images. Don't get me wrong, I'm a huge fan of clean digital imaging but I think there are more to imaging than trying to translate the light into clean digital files.
I've noticed that film is catching on a new wave, especially from the younger generation. The reason I think is the fact that they grew up in the digital age and film is something new to them. For us older generation who have grown up in film, we see the digital imaging as something new. On top of that, digital imaging has improved so much in the last 5 years that the old argument digital vs film has become pointless, as far as 'quality' was concerned.
But now, I'm questioning that idea of "quality". Does quality mean more megapixels? more accuracy in color?... I think that value of 'quality' varies from person to person, if not, per project to project. Here's one way of seeing it; What is the quality of wood? It is great as a building material, its light, somewhat flexible but strong, very shape-able... I think film has an inherent quality that is well suited for a certain look. It brings tactile texture to the two dimensional image, adding another sensory element in your photo other than visual. I think that's huge.
In the past several weeks, I've been playing around with this polaroid negative thing and I'm happy with the results that I'm getting. I'm telling you, its more than just nostalgia. With full movements of a large format camera, the look simply stands on its own.
Linhof 4x5 with Fujinon 150mm, Fuji FP-100c45. The back of the "negative" was bleached away so it can be translucent producing a negative. Washington DC, one of many museums... I forgot which.
The Native American Museum.
The colors were worked a bit in Lightroom after dust spots were taken care of in PS. I love the "organic" feel of these images. My approach was more visceral with more interpretation of the architecture. I did not want to do the typical architectural shots where all the lines are parallel and everything in focus. You know me.
Oh 'visceral' eh. I like this approach. I think photos are just more effective when you take them with your heart. If you have to reason through all different techniques and variations, you will not able to capture that special moment that you may never see again. Plus when you do it with your heart, you can better show your own style and the photo's ingenuity. These images are awesome. I like the tilted lines either by lens distortion or whatever it might be. Imperfection is good. It's all about learning then breaking all them rules :-)
ReplyDeleteWell said, Mimi!
ReplyDelete