Skip to main content

Featured in Oct. 2010 Popular Photography Issue

I was fortunate enough to be featured in the October issue of Popular Photography! I was one of 8 professional photographer to be interviewed about taking intimate candid photographs of family members. I remember flipping through that magazine when I was starting up, learning everything I can about photography.

They usually run more 'techy' articles so I was surprised that they were planning to publish more 'personal approach' story.




This was the photo that ran in the article. This was shot with a Hassleblad 500cm with 80 2.8 CF

Below is my answer to all the questions that Popular Photography has asked me about photographing candids of family members. Enjoy! 

• pleasures you take in shooting candids
• background selection
• background manipulation or improving
• composing thoughts
• establishing relationships with subject(s).
• conversational tactics
• strategies for coaxing photogenic behavior (especially from children)
• observation techniques
•  specific shooting techniques

I take pleasure in shooting candids because I love to tell stories. The showing of the relationship between the subjects, the space that they’re in and of course, a bit about myself is also included in the picture. Family life is intimate, and very familiar to all of us so the viewers can relate to them no matter what culture they are from.

In candids, I like to show the space that they are in, when I can. The room that they’re in shows their characters and what they value in their life.  To show the space I like to use fast wide angle lens. Wide angle is a bit tricky to use because if you don’t establish layers (foreground, background) you can lose the subject in the clutter. I like to establish the foreground with the subject, which means get closer! Rober Capa said it the best, ‘If it’s not good enough, you weren’t close enough’. This will give dominance to the subjects while still showing the background that will complete the story.

I will almost always look for elements that goes with the subject matter. If it doesn't add to the story, then I'll try a different angle so it is either eliminated or subdued. As far as manipulating or altering the background, I usually don’t, since I take a "documentary" approach. I do improve the background by "dodging and burning" though, to get the viewer's attention to the areas that I want them to focus on.

My Composition is done mostly instinctively when shooting candids. When I compose, I have in my mind what I think it is interesting in that particular scene. Only then, I can know if it’s okay to cut off this or that, or if this should be shown completely. I compose with my feet and my back. I’m constantly moving around, stooping, tiptoeing. I get sore after a shoot. There’s no other way to compose. You cannot move a wall, or place that person next to that person without interrupting the moment. It’s about where your lens is in relation to the subject.  Once I  have the image in my  viewfinder, I start asking questions. ‘What’s important here?’ and what is not? Then the walking, bobbing and weaving starts.  All this movement is clarifying what I want to show, and hiding what I don’t want to show.

One technique that I use frequently is that I frame the shot around the subjects first and wait for the "moment" to happen. Anticipation is a great tool in candid photography. When people see you pointing the camera at nowhere for few minutes they start to think, ‘oh he's not taking a picture of me’ and they go on with their business.

I’ve also noticed that the very act of lifting the camera up to my eyes gets people’s attention and can make the subjects nervous. I sometimes lift the camera and point it in some direction away from my intended subject. They'll think I'm photographing something else. Then using my peripheral vision, I rotate the camera to the intended subject and snap quickly and rotate the camera back to somewhere else. If you do this smoothly enough, they'll think I was just scanning the area. This technique is used more for strangers or in the streets. If you establish good relationships with your subjects, and they know what you're doing, you won’t have to use this technique.

A good ice breaker is to show your subject one of your shots (make sure it’s a good one) on your LCD screen. People are always self-conscious about how they look in pictures. If you can make them look natural, flattering and interesting, they'll be eager to be in your photos. Some photographers, back in the day, used to carry Polaroid cameras just for this purpose. Showing the pictures to your subjects engages your subject as  "participants" not as "victims".

I don't like to "coax" my subjects for photography. For some photographers they are experts at it and gets great results. But for me I'm more of an observer.  I do however tell them what I'm doing and take interest in what they are doing. This has to be genuine, of course. This gets them talking and they see you as a friend. Once you’re a friend, what you do with your camera is not offensive, you’re expressing interest in their lives, not exposing them. 

"Letting it unfold" is my motto when observing. You need to listen for the cues also. Sometimes you'll get warnings before the action happens. Somebody saying, "let’s cut the cake" means You know something good is going to happen. With candids, you need to be there before something interesting happens. Observing only allows you to see the rhythm of what’s going on in front of you, so you can anticipate the shot. If you react, then you'll be too late. It’s very much like shooting sports, you need to be quick and see it coming before it happens.

I use Canon 5d MKII. It does the job. It’s not too big, not too loud and I like the full size chip for the wide angles. Low light capability is great too, since a lot of canidid shots happen indoors. The Live View is nice for low or high angles shots. I like fast prime lenses. They are small, light and image qualities are excellent. The fastest zooms are 2.8's and are pretty big and heavy. They look like an elephant eye. Can you imagine being on the other side of that lens? I use 28mm 1.8, 50mm 1.2 and 100mm 2.0. without hoods, since they make the lens look bigger. They all fit in my small belt bag. I try to minimize my visual footprint, both with the camera and myself. I use simple black strap or thin wrist strap on the camera and the belt bag on my belly. I used to use a shoulder bag but I found myself always pushing it around.  As I shoot more and more I know what works for me and what doesn’t.  Your gear should reflect the way you work. It should help you not hinder you.

I usually use Program Time value or Aperature value. If I have time Manual. Since I handhold and sometimes walking backwards, high shutter speed gets things sharp. I tend to shoot with pretty open aperture since I want the viewer's attention on where I want it to be. The advanced metering in modern cameras and the ability to salvage highlight details when shooting RAW has simplified metering for me. But it is important to get it right as much as possible in camera first, of coarse.

I almost always shoot natural light, thanks to great low light sensitivity of the 5D. I like to see the light with my own eyes. Never liked using the on camera flash too much. If I use a studio flash, I will bounce the light on the ceiling or the wall. I’ll try to mimic natural lighting as much as I can.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Boston: B&W Architecture with Leica Q2M: From a Purist Perspective.

I swear I was going to switch out my black and white ONLY Leica Q2M to a regular Q2 color camera before going to this trip.  I"m glad I didn't.   Oh, before I forget, take a look at my icandy slide shows .  I will be making slideshows that is designed for big screen TV's.  Take a look at this one: Ok, back to the topic on hand.  So one of the most asked question about the Leica Q2M is, 'why limit yourself to just black and white when you can easily convert color photos to BW?'  Very good question.  My answer is,  if you know with certainty you want the best quality BW image possible, you want the dedicated monochrome camera.  Am I being a staunch purist? or is there a practical argument for it? Let's talk about it.  Beacon Street Boston,  MA One of many beautiful architecture on that hill.   First, this camera doesn't have any moire filter on the sensor.  Moire filters are on most color camera sensors to get rid ...

Air Show with Leica Q2M

 Never been to an air show... What's taken me so long?  It was pretty cool.  I've seen these aerial maneuvers on TV or YouTube, but seeing it live makes all the difference.  It was the Leesburg Airshow  held annually.  This one was on October 1st.  They're doing some crazy stuff up there!  They've provided a shuttle service from a nearby pick up area and the admission was free.  Can't complain about that.  I've always enjoyed aviation and the level of precision needed to fly these airplanes safely.  I've seen all the episodes of Air Disasters on the Smithsonian channel, so yeah I know all about aviation...  Restored vintage DC-3.  The "Yukon Sourdough" Here is an article about it . For this outing, I used my Leica Q2M camera .  I love the simplicity of this camera.  It was how photography used to be: shutter speed, aperture, and iso.  Those three things are the trinity of photography.  If you know how ...

Backpacking the Sierras (with my tiny but mighty camera)

Over the summer I had the chance to hike the James Muir Trail (JMT) that runs along the Sierra Nevada Mountains in California.  This trail starts at the Yosemite Valley and ends at Mount Whitney summit, which is the highest point in the lower 48 states at 14,505 feet.  The trail is 211 miles long with total elevation gain of 47,000 feet.   Click here to see the entire gallery Me by Garnet Lake  This was not a "photo" expedition for me (even though I did take a small camera and took around 4K photos!) I had many reasons why I didn't want to make it a photography trip.  Do you want to know why? Ok. My hiking crew.  Mt. Ritter in the back there yonder. Reason number 1).  This was my first real through hike.  For you newcomers a "through hike" means to hike in one session or outing, the entire length of a particular trail.  I've done multi-day section hikes on the  Appalachian Trail (AT) before, but for this hike we scheduled 23 days....