Skip to main content

Insane In The Membrane




Canon 5d MK3, 85mm 1.2L
See full portfolio

They say the definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different outcome.  Let it be known that I'm insane. (please, with a grain of salt…)

I've been to the Ball's Bluff Park in Leesburg for about 10 years now.  I've shot thousands of images there.  Some of them good and some not so good.  Each time I gather my things to shoot there, in my insane mind, I'm thinking that I can comeback with something different.  So I go there with my same cameras, same lens, sometimes the same pants and of coarse the same dog. (see below)

Chiquillo, useless assistant not due to lack of intelligence, but due to absence of opposable thumbs.

So there I was pondering my insanity in the woods.  How can I get something different here? I've seen this park in the morning, day and night. In fogs, snow, rain, hail… Should I move on now?

Canon 5d MK3, 85mm 1.2L
See full portfolio
So I started to ask myself some questions, "What is worthwhile to photograph here?" "Where exactly is the beauty in this place full of fallen trees and heaps of rotting leaves?" Yes, I think rotting tree trunks can be beautiful too (see my past blogs) but like I said, I wanted something different.

I've read about the Golden Rule, or the Fibonacci numbers that says that in nature, there is a mathematical formula that is constant in many things like tree branches, our blood vessels, flower petals, and the most famous, the spiral of a nautilus.

Canon 5d MK3, 85mm 1.2L
See full portfolio
Yes, tree branches. I've always thought that our blood vessels and the branching of our lungs looks so much like tree branches.  Not only that, but flying at 15,000 feet, rivers on land resembles this pattern also.

Canon 5d MK3, 85mm 1.2L
See full portfolio
So this was what I was interested in.  As it turns out, this barren park in a cloudy day was perfect to show this pattern.  I gazed upwards.  In my countless times that I was in this park how many times did I look strait up? To be honest, I did a few times, but never pursued it. I'm guessing that my mind was not ready to see it, or knew how to capture it. 

Canon 5d MK3, 85mm 1.2L
See full portfolio

Technique

Using my 85mm 1.2L lens, I pointed the lens up. With its very shallow depth of focus, I was able to isolate specific branches in the midst of other branches that would have cluttered it and confuse its pattern. I was shooting almost wide open f 2.0, so focusing was critical.  

I used the Live View mode and zoomed in to critically focus before each shot.  Holding up the heavy 85mm 1.2L lens while doing a full back-arch did a number on my back, but I think it can strengthen the core muscles if properly executed. I should blog about it later. 

Canon 5d MK3, 85mm 1.2L
See full portfolio
I wanted some branches in the background to show.  That's why I didn't opt for fully opened aperture of 1.2.  Also I wanted to do large prints so image quality was a factor.  As you may already know, all lenses lose some quality when they are fully opened.   

Post Processing

I worked the image in photoshop. I played with the levels (the output levels of different color channels) to get the background to have a color, as opposed to just cloud white.  That was why I was careful to not blow out the highlights in the sky when photographing.  I knew that I needed information in the sky to work with it in the computer later on. 

This technique of messing with the output level is different than "toning".  In toning, you are placing a color tint on more or less on the mid tones of the image, so the brightest and the darkest areas will be less affected.  Messing with the color output level is about placing a limit on what color will be shown on the picture at a certain brightness.  Instead of me trying to explain, tinker with it yourself.  'Experience best teacher…(Confucius).

I thought having this darker "cream base" almost mimics older photographic methods like albumen print and daguerreotype, but not so much so that the photos becomes more about the process.  I also thought this application pushes the idea away from "reality" so that we don't ponder where this is shot, what kind of tree it is and soforth. 

Canon 5d MK3, 85mm 1.2L
See full portfolio
I'm pleased with its simplicity and its minimalist approach of these photos.  I also like the fact that it looks abstract but organic at the same time.  Anybody agree? or am I insane? Where is that salt...

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Large Format ...Slight Return

Took out my Linhof 4x5 field camera out for a spin. Tripod, cable release, focusing cloth, loupe, lightmeter, and film holders! The gang's all here. Linhof Technica III, (circa 1940's) with Fujinon 150mm 5.6 a modern lens design.  Bull Run Park near Manassas VA.The camera is wonderfully made with machined aluminum with German engineering. Like Butter. Working with a 4x5 is a whole different world. It takes long to set up and there are so many things that you can screw up. "Did I cock the shutter? check focus?, meter reading, dark slide out? lock the movements?... There are like 13 different steps that you have to make to take a picture.  So why do it when I can just point my 5d and shoot in easy one two steps?  Reasons may vary, but I do it because of the camera movements. The tilts, swings, shifts. These cameras were made so you can technically control how the image hits the film plane. You can achieve "technically perfect" images, whatever that means. 
5 comments
Read more

Polaroid Negative?

I've been wanting to do color large format for awhile. When there were photo labs around the corner, it wasn't hard to do a E-6 process in a day or two. Now that process has gotten expensive and if you're doing sheet film, its even more pain. So my solution... Polaroid! well technically, it should be called "instant film" since Polaroid is trademarked term. I'm using  Fuji FP 100c45. But here's the twist. I wanted a different look. If I want true colors, I wouldn't bother with the cost of 2 bucks per shot.  I also was fascinated with some surface texture that I saw on polaroids.  I recently came across some sites that talks about turning a polaroid into negatives. Its true that Polariod years ago did have those positive/negative film, but they've discontinued all instant film a couple of years ago.   The process is simple. you take bleach and take off the black stuff on the part that you throw away.  Once the black part is off, you have a negati
5 comments
Read more

Boston: B&W Architecture with Leica Q2M: From a Purist Perspective.

I swear I was going to switch out my black and white ONLY Leica Q2M to a regular Q2 color camera before going to this trip.  I"m glad I didn't.   Oh, before I forget, take a look at my icandy slide shows .  I will be making slideshows that is designed for big screen TV's.  Take a look at this one: Ok, back to the topic on hand.  So one of the most asked question about the Leica Q2M is, 'why limit yourself to just black and white when you can easily convert color photos to BW?'  Very good question.  My answer is,  if you know with certainty you want the best quality BW image possible, you want the dedicated monochrome camera.  Am I being a staunch purist? or is there a practical argument for it? Let's talk about it.  Beacon Street Boston,  MA One of many beautiful architecture on that hill.   First, this camera doesn't have any moire filter on the sensor.  Moire filters are on most color camera sensors to get rid of those annoying repeating patterns that loo
Post a Comment
Read more